Reproductive success, parental care, and nest morphology of Manacus candei (Passeriformes, Pipridae)
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

Keywords

cup nest; gardens; nesting success; rain-forest fragments; white-collared manakin. nido de copa; jardines; éxito de anidación; fragmentos de selva tropical; saltarín cuelliblanco.

How to Cite

Riera Dinarés, S., Rojas, E., Mata-Núñez, M., & Sandoval, L. (2025). Reproductive success, parental care, and nest morphology of Manacus candei (Passeriformes, Pipridae). Revista De Biología Tropical, 73(S2), e64521. https://doi.org/10.15517/rev.biol.trop.v73iS2.64521

Abstract

Introduction: With the destruction of natural habitats due to human activities (i.e., agriculture and urbanization), species face new challenges to survive and reproduce. Some of the new challenges include predation rate and food resources, a lack of nesting substrates and the type of nesting materials (i.e., natural and artificial). Since predation is reported as the primary cause of nest loss in the tropics, studying its impact, along with nest morphology, in modified environments is essential to understanding its effects on species inhabiting these habitats.

Objective: This study evaluates nesting success and predation for the white-necked manakin (Manacus candei) in a fragmented area near the Tirimbina Biological Reserve (Costa Rica).

Methods: Between 2015 and 2019, 66 nests were monitored, 59 of which were used to calculate the daily survival rates (DSR) of the nests using the MARK program. The other seven nests were only monitored by camera traps to identify predators and observe the mother’s behavior. We measured 20 nests and compared the variation on morphology.

Results: The results suggest that DSR nests did not vary between months or years, and the constant survival model was the most suitable with an average of 95% and a real survival of 11.6%. This species suffered a 64% nest failure, mostly due to predation. In total, four nest predators were identified, three avian and a domestic cat. Additionally, two species of birds were observed stealing nesting material. Nests were very similar in morphology with a coefficient of variation below 38% in their measurements.

Conclusion: These results suggest that the non-natural garden zone could provide a safe nesting place for M. candei, since it could be acting on the predator community.

https://doi.org/10.15517/rev.biol.trop..v73iS2.64521
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

References

Baker, P. J., Molony, S. E., Stone, E., Cuthill, I. C., & Harris, S. (2008). Cats about town: is predation by free‐ranging pet cats Felis catus likely to affect urban bird populations? Ibis, 150, 86–99.

Barrantes, G., & Sandoval, L. (2019). El efecto de El Niño y La Niña sobre la abundancia de aves frugivoras y nectarivoras terrestres en tres bosques tropicales. Revista de Biología Tropical, 67, S282–S298.

Beckerman, A., Benton, T. G., Ranta, E., Kaitala, V., & Lundberg, P. (2002). Population dynamic consequences of delayed life-history effects. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 263–269.

Biamonte, E., Sandoval, L., Chacón, E., & Barrantes, G. (2011). Effect of urbanization on the avifauna in a tropical metropolitan area. Landscape Ecology, 26, 183–194.

Blom, J., & Lilja, C. (2005). A comparative study of embryonic development of some bird species with different patterns of postnatal growth. Zoology, 108, 81–95.

Brawn, J. D., Angehr, G., Davros, N., Robinson, W. D., Styrsky, J. N., & Tarwater, C. E. (2011). Sources of variation in the nesting success of understory tropical birds. Journal of Avian Biology, 42, 61–68.

Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33, 261–304.

Cancellieri, S., & Murphy, M. T. (2014). Experimental analysis of nest-site choice and its relationship to nest success in an open-cup–nesting passerine. Auk, 131, 539–548.

Codesido, M., & Bilenca, D. (2004). Variación estacional de un ensamble de aves en un bosque subtropical semiárido del Chaco Argentine. Biotropica, 36, 544–554.

Dinsmore, S. J., & Dinsmore, J. J. (2007). Modeling avian nest survival in program MARK. Studies in Avian Biology, 34, 73–83.

Dinsmore, S. J., White, G. C., & Knopf, F. L. (2002). Advanced techniques for modeling avian nest survival. Ecology, 83, 3476–3488.

DuVal, E. H. (2005). Adaptive advantages of cooperativecourtship in the Lance-tailed Manakin (Chiroxiphia lanceolata). [Ph.D. dissertation, University of California], Berkeley, CA.

Finegan, B., & Camacho, M. (1999). Stand dynamics in a logged and silviculturally treated Costa Rican rain forest, 1988–1996. Forest Ecology and Management, 121, 177–189.

Fusani, L., Barske, J., Day, L. D., Fuxjager, M. J., & Schlinger, B. A. (2014). Physiological control of elaborate male courtship: female choice for neuromuscular systems. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 46, 534–546.

Gaiotti, M. G., Webster, M. S., & Macedo, R. H. (2020). An atypical mating system in a neotropical manakin. Royal Society Open Science, 7, 191548.

Ghalambor, C. K., & Martin, T. E. (2001). Fecundity-survival trade-offs and parental risk taking in birds. Science, 292, 494–497.

Höglund, J., & Shorey, L. (2004). Genetic divergence in the superspecies Manacus. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 81, 439–447.

Kirwan, G. M., & G. Green. (2012). Cotingas and manakins. Princeton University Press.

Latif, Q. S., Heath, S. K., & Rotenberry, J. T. (2012). How avian nest site selection responds to predation risk: testing an ‘adaptive peak hypothesis’. Journal of Animal Ecology, 81, 127–138.

Lavery, T. H., Alabai, M., Holland P., Qaqara, C., & Vatohi, N. (2020) Feral cat abundance, density and activity in tropical island rainforests. Wildlife Research, 47, 660–668.

Libsch, M. M., Batista, C., Buehler, D., Ochoa, I., Brawn, J., & Ricklefs, R. E. (2008). Nest predation in a Neotropical forest occurs during daytime. Condor, 110, 166–170.

Marini, M. Â. (2017). Nesting success of birds from Brazilian Atlantic Forest fragments. Ornithology Research, 25, 77–83.

Martin, T. E. (1993). Nest predation and nest sites. BioScience, 43(8), 523–532.

Martin, T. E. (1995). Avian life history evolution in relation to nest sites, nest predation, and food. Ecological Monographs, 65, 101–127

Matysioková, B., & Remes, V. (2010). Incubation feeding and nest attentiveness in a socially monogamous songbird: Role of feather colouration, territory quality and ambient environment. Ethology, 166, 596–607.

Peluc, S. I., Sillett, T. S., Rotenberry, J. T., & Ghalambor, C. K. (2008). Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in an island songbird exposed to a novel predation risk. Behavioral Ecology, 19, 830–835.

Prum, R. O. (1990). Phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of display behavior in the Neotropical manakins (Aves: Pipridae). Ethology, 84, 202–231.

Prum, R. O. (1997). Phylogenetic tests of alternative intersexual selection mechanisms: trait macroevolution in a polygynous clade (Aves: Pipridae). American Naturalist, 149, 668–692.

Prum, R. O., & Lanyon, W. E. (1989). Monophyly and phylogeny of the Schiffornis group (Tyrannoidea). Condor, 91, 444–461.

Reidy, J. L. (2009). Nest predators of Lance-tailed Manakins on Isla Boca Brava, Panamá. Journal of Field Ornithology, 80, 115–118.

Ricklefs, R. E. (1969). An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 9, 1–48.

Robinson, W. D., Robinson, T. R., Robinson, S. K., & Brawn, J. D. (2000). Nesting success of understory forest birds in central Panama. Journal of Avian Biology, 31, 151–164.

Rodríguez-Aguilar, G., Orozco-Lugo, C. L., Vleut, I., & Vazquez, L. B. (2017). Influence of urbanization on the occurrence and activity of aerial insectivorous bats. Urban Ecosystems, 20, 477–488.

Ryder, T. B., Durães, R., Tori, W. P., Hidalgo, J. R., Loiselle, B. A., & Blake, J. G. (2008). Nest survival for two species of manakins (Pipridae) in lowland Ecuador. Journal of Avian Biology, 39, 355–358.

Sandoval, L. (2019). Variación mensual y anual de la riqueza y abundancia de aves en un mosaico agrícola periurbano tropical. Revista de Biología Tropical, 67, S298-S314.

Segura, L. N., & Berkunsky, I. (2012). Supervivencia de nidos del Cardenal Común (Paroaria coronata) en un hábitat modificado en Argentina. Ornitología Neotropical, 23, 489 –498.

Skutch, A. F. (1985). Clutch size, nesting success, and predation on nests of Neotropical birds, reviewed. Ornithological Monographs, 36, 575–594.

Slud, P. (1964). The birds of Costa Rica: distribution and ecology. Las aves de Costa Rica: distribución y ecología. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 128, 1–430.

Snow, D. (2020). White-collared Manakin (Manacus candei), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott, J. Sargatal, D. A. Christie, and E. de Juana (Eds.), Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA.

Styrsky, J. N., & Brawn, J. D. (2011). Annual fecundity of a Neotropical bird during years of high and low rainfall. Condor, 113, 194–199.

Visco, D. M., & Sherry, T. W. (2015). Increased abundance, but reduced nest predation in the chestnut-backed antbird in Costa Rican rainforest fragments: surprising impacts of a pervasive snake species. Biological Conservation, 188, 22–31.

White, G. C., & Burnham, K. P. (1999). Program MARK: survival estimations from populations of marked animals. Bird Study, 49, S120–S139.

Wolfe, J. D., Ralph, C. J., & Elizondo, P. (2015). Changes in the apparent survival of a tropical bird in response to the El Niño Southern Oscillation in mature and young forest in Costa Rica. Oecologia, 178, 715–721.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.